Washed PKS for Decarbonization of Iron and Steel Plants

The steel industry contributes 8% of global CO2 emissions, with each ton of steel produced producing an average of 1.85 tons of CO2 emissions. Compared to iron ore mining, iron and steel production contributes significantly more to CO2 emissions. Decarbonization efforts in the steel industry begin with the use of renewable energy for smelting. Biomass-based fuels, such as charcoal, which has a high carbon value, can replace the use of coke derived from coal. The use of hydrogen from renewable energy sources is the ultimate decarbonization target for the steel industry.

Currently, the steel industry largely uses coal as an energy source or reducing agent. This coal is processed into coke and used in blast furnaces. It is estimated that approximately 70% of global steel production uses the blast furnace or BF-BO process, and in China, over 90% of steel production uses the BF-BOF process. To reduce carbon intensity, natural gas is used as the fuel. The use of natural gas as a gaseous fuel also acts as a transition medium and, because it is derived from fossil fuels, is also a carbon-positive fuel.

Nearly all CO2 emissions in the steel production sector come from blast furnaces (BFs), which refine iron ore into crude iron or pig iron. The challenge is significant: there are approximately 1,850 steel mills worldwide, with approximately 1,000 using blast furnaces, producing approximately 1.5 billion tons of pig iron annually.

The use of charcoal in a blast furnace not only reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions but also sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions due to its very low sulfur content (approximately 100 times lower) than coke. Likewise, the use of limestone is reduced, thereby automatically reducing slag production. This also makes the blast furnace's operation acidic.

The use of biomass-based carbon fuel (biocarbon) in the form of charcoal has a better climate impact because it is carbon-neutral. Furthermore, technically, because it is a solid fuel, similar to coke derived from coal, it requires little or no changes or modifications to the smelting furnace. However, the availability of high-quality charcoal, large volumes, and a continuous supply remain major constraints.

This makes the use of charcoal to replace coal-based coke in blast furnaces crucial. Charcoal, derived from biomass, is a renewable, sustainable material used as a reducing agent or fuel in blast furnaces. The chemical reaction separates oxygen atoms from iron atoms, emitting CO2. This converts iron ore (Fe2O3) into crude (pig) iron.

However, the difference lies in the fact that the carbon source used as a reducing agent or fuel in a blast furnace comes from renewable and sustainable sources, making it a carbon-neutral process. Conversely, using coke from coal, as it comes from a fossil fuel, is a carbon-positive process. Similarly, using natural gas as a carbon source for reducing agents or fuel in a blast furnace, although it is said to have lower carbon intensity, is also considered a carbon-neutral process.

The use of charcoal or biocarbon materials for metallurgy or steelmaking has actually been commonplace for some time. In the early 1900s, global charcoal production reached its peak, exceeding 500,000 tons. In the 1940s, charcoal production declined to nearly half its early 1900s levels due to the replacement of other carbon materials, such as coke from coal, in the manufacture of steel and other metals.

Charcoal is a fuel and reducing agent derived from biomass that has significant potential for use during this transition phase. Palm kernel shells (PKS) are a potential biomass raw material for charcoal production. Palm kernel shells (PKS) are available in the millions of tons, ensuring a reliable supply. Charcoal, a product of biomass carbonization or pyrolysis, has a high calorific value, high fixed carbon content, and stability. However, another factor, ash chemistry, influences the quality of the resulting steel. This is somewhat similar to the ash chemistry of wood pellets from calliandra or gliricidia energy plantations.

When used as a reducing agent in blast furnaces, charcoal must have a low phosphorus content, while wood pellets from calliandra or gliricidia energy plantations must have low potassium, sodium, and chlorine content. The potassium, sodium, and chlorine content of wood pellets affects the quality of the wood pellets and their use in power generation. Pulverized combustion power plants, widely used worldwide, will reject wood pellets with this quality. Similarly, blast furnaces will reject charcoal with a high phosphorus content.

To achieve this quality, low-phosphorus content, the palm kernel shells (PKS) must first be washed. After washing, the phosphorus content decreases, and they are then dried and pyrolyzed, or carbonized, to produce palm kernel shell charcoal (PKSC). The same applies to wood pellets. The only difference is that wood pellet production doesn't involve pyrolysis or carbonization; instead, after drying and achieving the desired particle size, the pellets undergo biomass densification in a pelletizer.

Steel production requires an average of 6,000 MJ of energy per ton (equivalent to 50 kg of hydrogen) or 200 kg of charcoal, and requires approximately 600-800 kg of woody biomass as raw material. With a calorific value nearly identical to woody biomass, this is equivalent to using palm oil mills (PKS), which are plantation or agro-industrial waste.

Meanwhile, demand for low-carbon steel is growing rapidly as steel industries and governments worldwide commit to reducing carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The use of charcoal or biocarbon in blast furnaces is a key component of low-carbon steel production, as 100% of the steel is not yet produced using renewable energy. 

Slowing Palm Oil Land Expansion: Replanting or Biochar ?

The reckless expansion of palm oi plantations is definitely offside sustainability. Instead of palm oil being a blessing due to their highest productivity among other vegetable oil sources (soybeans, sunflowers, rapeseed, coconuts, etc.), growing only in tropical regions and contributing 40% of the global vegetable oil supply, they have instead become a natural disaster. The cost of this disaster is no small matter, costing thousands of lives, in addition to other material losses. This issue was particularly highlighted during the recent floods in Sumatra. Are the profits from palm oil worth the loss of life?

Clearing tens or even hundreds of thousands of hectares of oil palm plantations produces valuable timber. It's even possible to generate substantial profits from land clearing alone, even though palm oil plantations and production haven't even begun. This is what drives entrepreneurs to flock to this plantation sector, driven by the sole goal of maximizing profits without considering their own needs, resulting in widespread disasters. Furthermore, the implementation of mandatory B-40 or even B-50 biodiesel, currently being discussed, will undoubtedly create a new market for palm oil/CPO, much easier and more flexible than exporting to Europe, which is subject to the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), or to the US, which faces high tariffs.

Moreover, it has already been established that palm oil/CPO consumption for biodiesel has exceeded food demand. The mandatory implementation of the B-50 program also requires a 20% increase in CPO production capacity, or 60 million tons per year. The most profitable and fastest way to do this is through extensive deforestation, as the timber from cleared forests can be sold directly.

When the goal is to increase palm oil production gradually, safely, in a planned, and sustainable manner, adequate consideration is required, not blindly and recklessly clearing forest areas (deforestation) under the guise of land conversion. Besides the use of superior seeds, there are at least two ways to increase palm oil productivity: replanting and biochar application (part of land intensification).

According to Joko Supriyono, former chairman of GAPKI (Indonesian Palm Oil Producers Association) for the 2015-2018 and 2018-2023 periods, in his book "Is Indonesian Palm Oil Still Successful?", it is stated that if replanting of palm oil in Indonesia successfully reaches 300 thousand hectares per year, it is estimated that CPO and CPKO production in 2045 will reach 80 million tons. While currently CPO and CPKO production is around 55 million tons. And with the use of biochar, palm oil productivity will increase by an average of 30% in 5-10 years, meaning that by 2035 CPO and CPKO production will reach 71.5 million tons. Moreover, if the two methods are combined, the results should be even better.

Indonesia's current CPO production reaches approximately 50 million tons/year, covering a land area of ​​16.8 million hectares with an average CPO production of 3.55 tons/ha per hectare, or 3.55 million tons per million hectares. If biochar is used and productivity increases by 30%, this means an increase of 15 million tons of CPO (a total of 65 million tons of CPO/year) and this saves approximately 4.2 million hectares of land, or the use of biochar will slow down forest clearing for palm oil plantations. The application of biochar with compost will improve the quality of the compost to become premium compost. For more details, read here. This allows the palm oil industry to operate by utilizing all its biomass waste.

The replanting movement of palm oil plantations must be encouraged to continuously increase palm oil production. The problem of biomass waste from palm oil trees, which cover thousands of hectares, also poses a challenge. With such a large volume of old palm oil trees, utilizing them for value-added products is crucial. With an average hectare of palm oil plantations consisting of 125 trees, each tree having an average dry weight of 0.4 tons, this yields 50 tons of dry weight of biomass per hectare. For an area of ​​10,000 hectares, this yields 0.5 million tons of dry weight, and for an area of ​​100,000 hectares, this translates to 5 million tons of dry weight. An optimistic estimate suggests that Indonesia could achieve 5% replanting (very optimistic) or 820,000 hectares, which would yield 41 million tons of dry weight of biomass per year. Similarly, Malaysia, with 5% replanting or 285,000 hectares, would produce 14.25 million tons of dry weight per year.

Business readiness factors, both technologically and in terms of the market or user base, need to be carefully assessed. With such a large volume, biomass processing plants or industries can be established and operate optimally without worrying about raw material shortages. Products such as pellets, briquettes, biochar, and other bioproducts, such as other biocarbons, biomaterials, biofuels, and biochemicals, are also possible from this old palm oil trunk biomass waste. Old, dead oil palm trunks, often left unattended on land, should be utilized to produce these useful, value-added products. For more details on utilizing trunk waste for fuel pellet production (OPT Pellets), please read here. 

Exploring the Market for Bioenergy and Biocarbon Products in the Era of Global Decarbonization

The demand to lower the earth's temperature by reducing greenhouse gas concentrations through various global agreements such as the Paris Agreement and Net Zero Emissions (NZE) 2050, followed by technical follow-up through decarbonization for various sectors and industries, continues. This is the driving force for increasing renewable fuels, especially those based on biomass or bioenergy products, which have been implemented, but are experiencing dynamics in the form of fluctuations in demand and prices. Bioenergy, with its numerous advantages and uniqueness as a renewable energy, cannot be replaced in this era of global decarbonization, even though in the near future some subsidies for biomass fuels or bioenergy will be eliminated.

This is closely related to a government's decarbonization priorities, particularly among the various emerging options. Bioenergy products can vary in quality, but all have their own market segments within specific industries. Furthermore, the sustainability of biomass sources is also a crucial aspect in the business and use of bioenergy, and is strictly enforced by standards such as GGL, FSC, SBP, RED III, and SURE. Industrial groups such as cement, iron and steel, chemicals, and even the aviation sector, which previously relied 100% on fossil fuels or energy sources, are gradually shifting to renewable energy sources.

Bioenergy products such as industrial wood pellets and industrial wood briquettes are primarily marketed in the power generation industry and as fuel for industrial boilers. Industrial wood pellets are very popular and are produced in larger quantities than industrial wood briquettes. Due to the elimination of subsidies and the implementation of sustainability certification, biomass fuel producers are required to produce better quality products using environmentally friendly and accountable raw materials. This also applies to bioenergy derived from agricultural waste, which generally lacks sustainability certification at large production capacities.

Biomass power plants operating near carbon neutrality can then be upgraded to carbon-negative operation, or atmospheric carbon dioxide removal (CDR) by adding carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) equipment. Biomass power plants equipped with CCS devices are popularly called BECCS (Bio-Energy Carbon Capture and Storage). It is predicted that the BECCS era will not be far off, and countries with biomass power plants can easily upgrade to BECCS. Expensive CCS equipment and low carbon credit revenue from CDR remain current obstacles. Japan, with around 300 biomass power plants, has great potential to upgrade to BECCS. And as a biomass power plant, the need for fuel will always be needed, such as wood pellets and PKS (palm kernel shells). For more details, read here.

One successful example of BECCS is the Stockholm Exergi BECCS project. BECCS illustrates how existing biomass power generation infrastructure can be leveraged to generate sustainable carbon dioxide sequestration. The Stockholm project, based on sustainably sourced biomass fuel, secured one of the world’s largest carbon sequestration deals with Microsoft, a significant contract worth SEK 500 million (~89 billion rupiah). Their model integrates carbon capture with a district heating system, maximizing energy efficiency while achieving permanent carbon dioxide sequestration.

Similarly, several other large industries, such as cement, aluminum, and chemicals, are also gradually decarbonizing. Biomass fuels, such as wood pellets and agricultural/plantation waste like palm kernel shells (PKS), are preferred in this sector. Besides their high energy content, these biomass fuels are more affordable than derivatives like torrefied biomass and charcoal/biochar. With the gradual transition or decarbonization of these industries, the demand for biomass fuels will also continue to increase.

Meanwhile, biocarbon products such as torrified biomass (biocoal) and carbonized biomass (biochar/charcoal) are starting to attract attention and are expected to reach mass production levels in the near future. Power plants typically favor biocoal due to its higher energy content, hydrophobicity, which allows it to be stored in open areas like coal, and ease of crushing (high grindability index). Meanwhile, biochar/charcoal, especially in the iron and steel industry, is highly suitable for producing low-carbon steel and even green steel. The reductant for blast furnaces, which previously used coke from coal, can be replaced by charcoal or biochar. Charcoal or biochar with high purity (fixed carbon >85%) and low impurities are required for blast furnace reductants. For more details on this, please read here and here.

Meanwhile, the use of biomass for sustainable aviation fuel or SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel) is also very possible. This is because currently there are three leading production processes for SAF production: HEFA (Hydro-processed Esters and Fatty Acids), FT (Fischer-Tropsch), and ATJ (Alcohol to Jet Fuel). Biomass through thermochemical processes, namely in FT (Fischer-Tropsch) and biochemical processes, namely in ATJ (Alcohol to Jet Fuel), can be used as raw material or feedstock. Meanwhile, the raw material or feedstock for the HEFA process is not solid biomass but vegetable oil, used cooking oil, animal fats, and so on. So the broad application of biomass as various important energy sources in the era of global decarbonization is a driving force for biomass production both through the forestry sector and sustainable agriculture/plantations.

 

Biochar or Biocoal Production?

Biochar and biocoal production are basically one breath. Biochar production with full pyrolysis while biocoal with half/mild pyrolysis (torrefaction). The purpose of torrefaction/mild pyrolysis is to increase its energy content and make it hydrophobic so it is called biocoal. While the purpose of full pyrolysis is to produce stable biocarbon material so that it does not decompose in the soil for hundreds or even thousands of years and improve soil fertility so as to increase plant productivity (agriculture and forestry). 

Current biochar applications are mainly for agriculture and biochar production will produce excess heat, syngas and biooil as energy sources. While biocoal only focuses on energy. The benefits of biochar production are obtained from the sale of biochar, the sale of carbon credits and the utilization of by-products (full) pyrolysis. While the benefits of biocoal are only from the sale of biocoal itself.

The selection or development of a business will be related to business readiness (market, technology, investment, etc.) and other benefits, namely benefits in the social and environmental sectors.