Biochar, Soil Health, and the Sustainability of Palm Oil Productivity

Healthy soil is invariably fertile, but fertile soil is not necessarily healthy. Healthy soil teems with life—such as earthworms and other organisms—that naturally provides nutrients. Continuous use of chemical fertilizers without a corresponding addition of organic matter depletes soil microorganism populations. Over the long term, this causes the soil to harden, reduces its nutrient-supplying capacity, and increases crop dependence on chemical fertilizers. Consequently, production costs rise while land quality steadily declines.

The future of the palm oil industry is no longer solely about increasing production; it is also required to demonstrate that productivity can go hand-in-hand with environmental protection and social acceptance. Palm oil plantations must be grounded in the three pillars of sustainability: generating economic profit, gaining social acceptance, and preserving the environment. These principles also guide the implementation of the Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) standard. Balanced fertilization—combining chemical (inorganic) and organic fertilizers—serves as one such solution.

These two types of fertilizers serve complementary functions. Chemical or inorganic fertilizers provide nutrients rapidly, whereas organic fertilizers improve soil structure and health, thereby sustaining productivity over the long term. A well-balanced combination of the two can maintain high productivity while ensuring land sustainability. Another equally important factor is the use of superior-quality seedlings that are certified or come from reliable sources with proven quality; if the seedlings are unsuitable, the results will not be optimal, regardless of how well they are fertilized.

Biochar is not a fertilizer, so its nutrient content is very low. While some types of biochar do possess relatively high nutrient levels, these are exceptions or added bonuses. As an organic material, biochar is environmentally friendly and derived from renewable sources. Its use also enhances fertilization efficiency—specifically Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE)—for both chemical (inorganic) and organic fertilizers. This is because biochar transforms fertilizers into slow-release products, allowing nutrient availability to better align with plant needs; read more details here.

Biochar significantly supports soil health due to its favorable physical, chemical, and biological properties. Physically, it features high porosity and low bulk density; chemically, it offers high cation exchange capacity (CEC), alkalinity (high pH), and high carbon stability; and biologically, it serves as a habitat for microorganisms and stimulates soil enzyme activity. Furthermore, biochar is capable of binding toxic substances. This is due to its strong adsorption capacity, which allows it to capture heavy metals (such as lead or cadmium) and chemical pesticide residues present in the soil. These harmful substances are trapped within the biochar's pores, preventing their uptake by plant roots. For more details on biochar quality parameters, read here.

Biochar application is also a climate solution. Biochar can store carbon for hundreds of years in the soil. Each ton of biochar can store up to 3 tons of carbon / CO2 equivalent. This makes it very possible to get carbon credits. For this reason, biochar producers must use methodologies created by carbon standard institutions such as Verra, Puro, CSI (Carbon Standard International), Isometric and so on. By using biochar, fertilizer application becomes optimal, environmentally friendly and improves social acceptance in the community. Economically, the use of biochar can also be very profitable. So regarding biochar, soil health and sustainable palm oil productivity, biochar is very suitable and relevant so its use needs to be widely socialized and increased.

When the soil is healthy, fertilizer use becomes more efficient. High dosages are not always necessary, yet productivity can still increase because the soil functions naturally. Shifting the paradigm to recognize that sustainable productivity depends on soil health is no longer merely an option, but a necessity. Global markets are increasingly scrutinizing production methods, making environmentally friendly cultivation practices a key factor in the competitiveness of Indonesian palm oil. A model that successfully boosts productivity while lowering production costs—all while preserving the environment for long-term sustainability—naturally serves as an exemplary standard.

Liquid Smoke-Based Biostimulant (Foliar Fertilizer) for Application to Palm Oil Plantations Using Drones

In palm oil plantations, fertilizer is the highest cost component of their operations. Therefore, various efforts are made to optimize fertilization to ensure its maximum efficiency, including the use of slow-release fertilizers. For more details, read here. To maximize fertilization and maximize fresh fruit bunch (FFB) yields, the use of foliar fertilizers is also worth considering. Liquid smoke (pyroligneous acid) is one such foliar fertilizer, although a more accurate term is biostimulant (booster).

This is because liquid smoke does not provide nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K). However, liquid smoke acts as a biostimulant, plant growth regulator (PGR), and natural protectant, promoting optimal leaf growth. Optimal leaf growth exponentially increases the growth of all plant organs, including stems, roots, flowers, fruit, and so on. Leaves are the primary "kitchen" of a plant, so leaf health determines the health of the entire plant system. Optimal leaf growth also increases the efficiency of fertilizer absorption (a "pump engine" effect) in the soil.

Furthermore, liquid smoke is not only used as "leaf fertilizer", it turns out that liquid smoke also functions as an organic pesticide (fungicide/insecticide). This repels pests (such as ticks and flies), and prevents leaf diseases. The phenol and acetic acid content is toxic to insects (aphids, thrips, caterpillars) and is effective in suppressing fungi that cause plant diseases. And the distinctive smell of smoke makes insects reluctant to approach and lay their eggs on the surface of the leaves. In addition, its binding properties make it difficult for pathogenic fungal spores to attach and develop on the surface of the leaves

Regarding this dual function, the use of liquid smoke for application to leaves (foliar) can be prioritized, whether it is more specifically used as a "foliar fertilizer" or as a biopesticide. This requires a number of adjustments such as dosage, additional formulations and application time. To maximize the function of liquid smoke as a leaf fertilizer, you must mix it with additional nutrients (such as liquid organic fertilizer / LOF) and apply it when the leaf stomata are fully open. Liquid smoke is able to reduce water molecules. When diluted or mixed with Liquid Organic Fertilizer (LOF), the nutritional content of the fertilizer becomes easier to enter and be absorbed through the stomata (leaf mouth). Meanwhile, to maximize its function as a biopesticide, liquid smoke needs to be combined with other vegetable pesticides. The frequency of spraying for prevention is once a week, while pest attacks are high, namely 2-3 times a week until the pest population is under control.

The use of drones for spraying pesticides and liquid fertilizer has been widely used on various agricultural crops such as rice, corn, sugar cane and palm oil. More specifically in palm oil plantations, drone applications are a modern solution for spraying fertilizers and pesticides. And in Indonesia more than 80% of drone applications are for the forestry and agricultural sectors. Efficiency factors (time, energy, operational costs, fertilizers, pesticides) and precision are the main driving forces for this drone application. This means that drone technology is expected to be an effective solution in controlling pests and diseases, fertilizing and cultivating palm oil plants. Drones are effective in increasing plantation efficiency, especially in areas that are difficult to reach. As a technology, various improvements have been made to improve its functions such as carrying capacity, spray speed, safety features and work efficiency. The use of drones supports precision agriculture and global food security with an environmentally friendly technological approach.

Spraying liquid fertilizer on the underside of leaves (underside spraying) using a drone requires special techniques. This is because drone propellers naturally produce strong downwash. This downwash effect is used to gently move and turn the leaves, so that the droplets can hit the bottom of the leaves. This is because on the bottom of the leaf, where the stomata are located the most are gathered around 80%. The spray texture is also made into mist mode (the finest dew) so that the liquid sticks evenly and doesn't drip onto the ground. Next, the drone's height, speed and nozzle angle need to be adjusted in such a way to achieve this goal. Environmental factors in the form of strong winds need to be avoided so it is necessary to adjust the right time and conditions.

As the use of biochar grows as a solution for health and soil fertility as well as a climate solution, this should also be the case with the application of liquid smoke. Liquid smoke as a by-product in the form of a liquid product from biochar production will increase along with increasing biochar production. Liquid smoke as a product produced from biomass raw materials through a pyrolysis process also encourages the use of natural materials based on renewable resources so that it is environmentally friendly and sustainable. 

Electricity Production from Pyrolysis, Using a Gas Engine or ORC Generator?

The more efficient the equipment, the greater the benefits or profits that can be obtained. This includes equipment for biochar production, namely pyrolysis. The more efficient the pyrolysis equipment, the cheaper it will be to produce biochar but also produce development products. An example is the use of byproducts from the pyrolysis process such as syngas, biooil, pyroligneous acid and excess heat. Harvesting or utilizing energy from waste heat sources that would normally be wasted is also part of efficiency as well. A number of products that can be used for energy production can be used for electricity production, namely syngas, biooil and excess heat. But there are a number of technologies for producing electricity, so which one do you choose?

A. Gas Engine

Gas engines such as the GE Jenbacher are commonly used to produce electricity from biogas. Biogas, which is a product of bioprocess, has a very dominant methane gas content, while syngas from pyrolysis, which is a thermal process, contains only a small amount of methane and more hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO), this means that gas engines are not suitable for producing electricity from syngas pyrolysis. Apart from being suitable for biogas, gas engines such as the GE Jenbacher are also suitable for natural gas, which also contains methane gas.

B. ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle)

The main difference between the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and the ordinary Rankine cycle lies in the working fluid and the temperature of the heat source used. ORC was specifically designed as a modification of the conventional Rankine cycle. The difference with the ordinary Rankine Cycle which uses steam from the boiler as the working fluid which is widely used in large capacity coal powerplants, the ORC uses a working fluid in the form of an organic fluid which has a low boiling point such as hydrocarbons or refrigerants. This low boiling point means that you can use a heat source whose temperature is not too high, such as waste heat or residual heat and so on.

And because there are many organic fluids available, selecting organic materials as suitable working fluids for ORC is no less important. In fact, the choice of working fluid for the ORC generator is very crucial because it affects thermodynamic efficiency, operational costs and safety aspects. The main factors considered are the thermophysical properties of the fluid, compatibility with the heat source, environmental impact, and commercial availability (economic aspects). So the selection of ORC fluid must balance energy efficiency, safety, environmental impact and cost.

Waste heat from pyrolysis can be recovered and used for electricity production with this ORC. Likewise, pyrolysis byproducts that can be used as energy sources are excess syngas and bio-oil. The excess syngas and bio-oil are used as fuel and the heat is used as an energy source for the ORC generator. Basically, the selection of an ORC power plant is based on electricity needs and available energy sources. 

For small electricity needs, namely in the range of 0.5 MW - 10 MW and low temperature energy sources, namely those whose temperature is below 350 C (low to medium temperature range (80 C - 350 C)), then the choice of ORC is suitable. As a comparison, steam turbines require temperatures well above 400 C and a power output of 10 MW to above 1,000 MW (as in coal-fired power plants or nuclear power plants). But why do almost all palm oil mills (CPO / crude palm oil mills), even though their electrical power production is small or an average of less than 5 MW, still use steam turbines? For an explanation, read here.

The application of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) generator as waste heat to power (WHP) from the pyrolysis process is a very effective combination to increase the total energy efficiency of the system (co-generation). And modern pyrolysis units are widely used in continuous system biomass pyrolysis, namely for biochar production, which work autothermally or self-sustainably, so it is possible that the pyrolysis unit can also operate independently from the electricity generator from the ORC. This means it will reduce operational costs, because the electricity to run electric motors, pumps and so on comes from its own production. In other words, the pyrolysis unit operates independently without depending on the electricity network or PLN (Indonesia state owned company). From a climate perspective, these conditions are ideal, because the energy source comes from renewable sources (carbon neutral) and if biochar is used for carbon sequestration it means it is carbon negative. Optimizing the system so that it produces an optimal and profitable configuration is the task of engineers.

An American company, namely Quonset Soil Solutions, LLC in Rhode Island, has recently successfully installed an ORC unit to harvest waste heat from their pyrolysis unit with a capacity of 1.8 MW. Apart from that, several pyrolysis units in Europe are also reported to be using ORC with a smaller capacity. These successes will inspire and the installation of ORC units as part of biochar production with (slow) pyrolysis will continue to grow.

Conclusion:
-The ORC system is highly recommended for continuous scale pyrolysis plants (not small batch types) because it is able to convert heat pollution (waste heat) into valuable electrical energy assets constantly. ORC operations are environmentally friendly and support decarbonization targets.

-The ORC generator from waste heat pyrolysis is an efficient, safe and sustainable solution for generating electricity from waste heat energy (residual heat). This technology is also ideal for various industries that produce intermediate heat, so that energy is not wasted.

The Role of Biochar in Increasing Palm Oil Productivity, Among the Use of Superior Seeds and Replanting

Palm oil productivity continues to be pushed to its most optimal point. This is because it is to meet the increasing needs, especially the mandatory B-50 biodiesel program. Of course, efforts to optimize productivity are not easy and instant. Although the key points for its realization have also been mapped, namely by replanting old palm oils, using superior seeds and intensification, the practice also requires the right method or approach and takes time. Replanting old palm oils is still very slow and has many obstacles, while the use of superior seeds has received more attention and continues to be encouraged. The analogy of using superior seeds is like comparing local cattle and superior breeds. So no matter how well the Javanese cow is cared for, its weight will not match that of the Limousin cow. Likewise with palm oil seeds.

Land intensification efforts through optimizing inputs, technology and modern cultivation methods also still need to be developed. Meanwhile, extensification or land expansion should be avoided or slowed down as much as possible, for more details, read here. Biochar can have an important role in this area of ​​intensification. Apart from the application of biochar it will improve soil health, which is an important prerequisite for plants to be able to produce optimally, it is also very environmentally friendly because the raw material for biochar is from renewable sources, namely biomass and increases fertilization efficiency (NUE = Nutrient Use Efficiency). And even the application of biochar is also a climate solution, namely as carbon sequestration. Optimizing productivity can be done by applying biochar plus using superior seeds using modern and environmentally friendly agricultural methods. So basically optimization is a comprehensive and measurable effort.

Indonesia contributes 25% to the world's vegetable oil supply, making it a key actor in the stability of the world's vegetable oil supply. With this position, any changes in production, export policies and Indonesia's domestic dynamics will directly impact prices and international market balance. Indonesia is currently the largest or number one producer of palm oil in the world, but it is not the best or most productive because its productivity is not yet optimal. Compared to neighboring countries, namely Malaysia, it is still inferior and slightly superior to Thailand, even though geographical factors, namely the climate in Indonesia, are much more supportive. Currently, Indonesia's CPO productivity is around 3.3 tons/hectare, while Malaysia's is around 3.8 tons/hectare, while Thailand's is around 3 tons/hectare.

Yield gap, namely the difference or gap between actual production and maximum production potential, is sometimes quite large. Several main factors that trigger yield gaps include non-optimal environmental factors such as drought conditions, to errors in cultivation practices such as errors in land clearing and planting, as well as inaccuracies in diagnosis and fertilizer recommendations. This yield gap must be minimized so that palm oil productivity can be maximized.

Sometimes the role of biochar cannot be found or seen directly in various efforts to increase palm oil productivity, but the application of biochar is very much in line with this goal. For example, the success of an palm oil replanting program depends, among other things, on the quality of seeds, fertilization, plant population and soil health. Soil health and fertilization factors can be closely related to biochar. And related to biofungicides to treat ganoderma fungus disorders, biochar can be used as a carrier formulated with other elements such as humus, amino acids, humates, hormones and so on. And because the only effective way to control the ganoderma fungus is to introduce its natural enemies in the form of biofungicides based on Trichoderma spp and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi into the soil. However, there are still many parties who do not have adequate knowledge regarding the application of biochar.

Apart from boosting production, implementing best management practices is also important to meet sustainability standards amidst increasing pressure from environmental issues. And the application of biochar is very much in line with that point. In fact, regarding low carbon palm oil technology in the application of biochar, it is very relevant to the CECC (Controlled Emission Composting Chamber) and for more details on the application of biochar for composting, read here. Meanwhile, the trend of fertilization in palm oil plantations with the application of slow release fertilizer is also very relevant to biochar, for more details, read here. 

Washed PKS for Decarbonization of Iron and Steel Plants

The steel industry contributes 8% of global CO2 emissions, with each ton of steel produced producing an average of 1.85 tons of CO2 emissions. Compared to iron ore mining, iron and steel production contributes significantly more to CO2 emissions. Decarbonization efforts in the steel industry begin with the use of renewable energy for smelting. Biomass-based fuels, such as charcoal, which has a high carbon value, can replace the use of coke derived from coal. The use of hydrogen from renewable energy sources is the ultimate decarbonization target for the steel industry.

Currently, the steel industry largely uses coal as an energy source or reducing agent. This coal is processed into coke and used in blast furnaces. It is estimated that approximately 70% of global steel production uses the blast furnace or BF-BO process, and in China, over 90% of steel production uses the BF-BOF process. To reduce carbon intensity, natural gas is used as the fuel. The use of natural gas as a gaseous fuel also acts as a transition medium and, because it is derived from fossil fuels, is also a carbon-positive fuel.

Nearly all CO2 emissions in the steel production sector come from blast furnaces (BFs), which refine iron ore into crude iron or pig iron. The challenge is significant: there are approximately 1,850 steel mills worldwide, with approximately 1,000 using blast furnaces, producing approximately 1.5 billion tons of pig iron annually.

The use of charcoal in a blast furnace not only reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions but also sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions due to its very low sulfur content (approximately 100 times lower) than coke. Likewise, the use of limestone is reduced, thereby automatically reducing slag production. This also makes the blast furnace's operation acidic.

The use of biomass-based carbon fuel (biocarbon) in the form of charcoal has a better climate impact because it is carbon-neutral. Furthermore, technically, because it is a solid fuel, similar to coke derived from coal, it requires little or no changes or modifications to the smelting furnace. However, the availability of high-quality charcoal, large volumes, and a continuous supply remain major constraints.

This makes the use of charcoal to replace coal-based coke in blast furnaces crucial. Charcoal, derived from biomass, is a renewable, sustainable material used as a reducing agent or fuel in blast furnaces. The chemical reaction separates oxygen atoms from iron atoms, emitting CO2. This converts iron ore (Fe2O3) into crude (pig) iron.

However, the difference lies in the fact that the carbon source used as a reducing agent or fuel in a blast furnace comes from renewable and sustainable sources, making it a carbon-neutral process. Conversely, using coke from coal, as it comes from a fossil fuel, is a carbon-positive process. Similarly, using natural gas as a carbon source for reducing agents or fuel in a blast furnace, although it is said to have lower carbon intensity, is also considered a carbon-neutral process.

The use of charcoal or biocarbon materials for metallurgy or steelmaking has actually been commonplace for some time. In the early 1900s, global charcoal production reached its peak, exceeding 500,000 tons. In the 1940s, charcoal production declined to nearly half its early 1900s levels due to the replacement of other carbon materials, such as coke from coal, in the manufacture of steel and other metals.

Charcoal is a fuel and reducing agent derived from biomass that has significant potential for use during this transition phase. Palm kernel shells (PKS) are a potential biomass raw material for charcoal production. Palm kernel shells (PKS) are available in the millions of tons, ensuring a reliable supply. Charcoal, a product of biomass carbonization or pyrolysis, has a high calorific value, high fixed carbon content, and stability. However, another factor, ash chemistry, influences the quality of the resulting steel. This is somewhat similar to the ash chemistry of wood pellets from calliandra or gliricidia energy plantations.

When used as a reducing agent in blast furnaces, charcoal must have a low phosphorus content, while wood pellets from calliandra or gliricidia energy plantations must have low potassium, sodium, and chlorine content. The potassium, sodium, and chlorine content of wood pellets affects the quality of the wood pellets and their use in power generation. Pulverized combustion power plants, widely used worldwide, will reject wood pellets with this quality. Similarly, blast furnaces will reject charcoal with a high phosphorus content.

To achieve this quality, low-phosphorus content, the palm kernel shells (PKS) must first be washed. After washing, the phosphorus content decreases, and they are then dried and pyrolyzed, or carbonized, to produce palm kernel shell charcoal (PKSC). The same applies to wood pellets. The only difference is that wood pellet production doesn't involve pyrolysis or carbonization; instead, after drying and achieving the desired particle size, the pellets undergo biomass densification in a pelletizer.

Steel production requires an average of 6,000 MJ of energy per ton (equivalent to 50 kg of hydrogen) or 200 kg of charcoal, and requires approximately 600-800 kg of woody biomass as raw material. With a calorific value nearly identical to woody biomass, this is equivalent to using palm oil mills (PKS), which are plantation or agro-industrial waste.

Meanwhile, demand for low-carbon steel is growing rapidly as steel industries and governments worldwide commit to reducing carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The use of charcoal or biocarbon in blast furnaces is a key component of low-carbon steel production, as 100% of the steel is not yet produced using renewable energy. 

Slow-Release Fertilizer: A New Trend in the Palm Oil Industry

Fertilizer is crucial for plant growth, especially for palm oils. Palm oil trees won't even bear fruit without fertilization. Fertilization is the highest cost component of palm oil plantation operations. Fertilizer efficiency is clearly a key consideration. This is why innovation in palm oil fertilization is rapidly developing.

Regarding innovations to increase fertilizer efficiency in palm oil plantations, the concept of slow-release fertilizer (SRF), or controlled-release fertilizer (CRF), is gaining increasing attention. By engineering the slow or controlled release of nutrients, the plant's nutrient use efficiency (NUE) increases. Fertilizer becomes more economical and environmental pollution is reduced. Indonesia's tropical climate, with its high rainfall, also results in high fertilizer leaching.

Several materials have been developed as SRF/CRF agents to achieve the desired nutrient release levels. These include polymers, sulfur, chemical compounds, and even compost. The characteristics of SRF/CRF agents vary depending on the material and product type. In addition to performance, the price of the SRF/CRF agent is also an important consideration.

Biochar is a renewable SRF/CRF agent and a climate solution. Biochar can persist for hundreds of years in the soil as a carbon sequestration. In addition to synthetic materials derived from non-renewable sources, biochar is an alternative SRF/CRF agent derived from renewable sources. Biomass from agricultural, plantation, and forestry waste is the main source of biochar production through the pyrolysis process. A number of SRF/CRFs with slow-release biochar agents have also begun production. This will increase biochar production, which has so far been less popular. It will also provide a solution to the biomass waste problem and be economically valuable. 

Energy Sources for Data Centers: Between Growth and Sustainability and the Role of Bioenergy

Data centers are physical facilities that house computer systems and related infrastructure, such as servers and storage, used to store and process data. They form the foundation of a nation's computing power and are a core dependency in building large-scale Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI data centers, in particular, are particularly energy-intensive. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), a typical AI data center currently uses as much energy as 100,000 households, while large AI centers currently consume about 20 times that amount (2 million households).

The computing power needed to support AI growth is also doubling approximately every 100 days. For example, Malaysia, it is not surprising that data center energy consumption in Malaysia is projected to soar to more than 5,000 MW by 2035, which is 40 percent of Peninsular Malaysia's current power capacity, or 11.1 percent of Malaysia's projected power capacity in 2035. Meanwhile, in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the projection of data center electricity consumption in Indonesia has increased significantly, predicted to reach 5,200 MW in 2034 and could even reach 12,000 MW in 2033. And the current capacity in 2025 is only around 274 MW and with a predicted growth of 16.8% per year, it can reach the target of >2,000 MW in 2029.

There are at least two main drivers of growth in the data center industry. First, demand-side factors include the growth of cloud computing and AI, along with the increasing global demand for data storage and processing capacity for everyday tasks like social networking, e-commerce, and data storage. Second, supply-side factors include the availability of resources such as electricity and water, fiber optic connectivity, and land availability.

In the growing data center industry, high or wasteful energy consumption has contributed to rising electricity prices for residents and small businesses. Each country should learn from these case studies as they strive to strike a balance between growth and sustainability. For example, in Georgia, the fastest-growing data center market in the country, Georgia Power reports that 80 percent of the projected 8,200 MW increase in energy demand by 2030 is related to planned data centers opening in the state. To address the increased demand, base electricity rates have been raised and new nuclear power plant (NPP) are under construction.

Georgia is an attractive market for data centers, given its relatively low electricity prices, with industrial electricity rates about 42 percent below the US national average. Significant tax relief was also promised, with at least $163 million in state collections eliminated and local sales tax annually starting in 2022. However, starting in 2023, the average Georgia Power residential customer will pay $43 more per month following a base rate increase. To address this challenge, a Senate bill was introduced to protect residential and commercial customers from higher electricity bills due to the utility's significant investment in AI-powered energy needs.

Efforts to address the increasing energy demand for data centers while reducing their environmental impact are necessary. Typical approaches include optimizing Power Use Effectiveness (PUE) and related metrics, as well as shifting to renewable energy. The use of renewable energy for data centers remains limited, or even at a small capacity of less than 5%. Renewable energy sources still prioritize solar and intermittent wind.

Industry participants also state that the intermittent nature of solar energy (at least without a well-developed battery storage system) does not make it an ideal energy source for data centers, given the need to keep data centers running 24/7. With limited solar generating capacity, data centers often rely on backup diesel generators. While renewable diesel (biodiesel and green diesel) is an available option, there are currently no regulations encouraging this transition.

Biomass as an energy source, or bioenergy, for data centers is still very limited. This biomass can be used directly in biomass power plants, where the CFB type is very common, or through co-firing in coal-fired power plants. Furthermore, biomass can be utilized as an energy source and biochar production through pyrolysis technology, as is the case with this US company. The syngas from pyrolysis serves as a carbon-neutral energy source, and biochar is the primary product for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), resulting in carbon-negative operations. 

Processing of Empty Palm Fruit Bunches (EFB) for Ash Production as Potassium Fertilizer and Energy

Palm oil mills produce a large amount of biomass waste, and one of the largest in their daily operations is empty fruit bunches (EFB). Comprising approximately 22% of the fresh fruit bunches (FFB) processed by the mill, the volume becomes enormous and piles up daily if not managed properly. For example, a palm oil mill with a capacity of processing 60 tons of FFB per hour for 20 hours per day produces 264 tons of empty fruit bunch waste per day (approximately 6,600 tons per month and 79,200 tons per year). This enormous amount would resemble a hill if piled up in one place.

Incinerators have recently become popular, particularly in Indonesia, for processing empty fruit bunches due to their speed and practicality. Furthermore, the ash produced by burning them can be used as fertilizer due to their high potassium content. However, these incinerators produce exhaust emissions that pollute the environment, including black smoke and particulate matter. These emissions, which pollute the environment and exceed the threshold permitted by the Ministry of Environment (KLH), have led to the prohibition of incinerators. This ban has led to an increasing number of unmanaged empty fruit bunches. Using empty fruit bunches for mulch is also less effective, and composting, a biological process, takes a long time.

Video link for conventional EFB incinerator here

This problem demands an immediate and effective solution. The quickest practical solution is to upgrade the incinerator to make it environmentally friendly or to reduce emissions below the required threshold. This can be achieved by using adequate emission control devices to meet these environmental requirements. While many emission control devices are available, cost and target output are crucial considerations when selecting them. This approach not only addresses the problem of empty fruit bunches, but the resulting ash can also be used as a potassium fertilizer.

Furthermore, by upgrading the incinerator with emission controls (basic type), the equipment can be developed into several types, as follows: the second type is a cogeneration boiler for palm oil mills, allowing 100% palm kernel shell (PKS) to be sold, even for export. The third type is by adding a new boiler and steam turbine for electricity production, which is then sold to PLN (Indonesia State Owned Electricity Company) under a power purchase agreement (PPA). The fourth type is equipped with waste heat recovery equipment, allowing for more general use. This also means the combustion process in the upgraded incinerator can also be upgraded so that the combustion process can run optimally. Several combustion technologies, such as chain grates, step grates, or reciprocating grates, can be considered to achieve maximum performance, including the removal and handling of ash product.

Empty fruit bunches (EFB) processing can vary, although the primary focus is addressing environmental pollution caused by them. However, their large volumes certainly represent a potential raw material for processing units. Therefore, in addition to addressing this waste, the technology used must also provide financial benefits. Of the numerous EFB processing technology options, the cost-to-benefit ratio of a technology application will be a crucial consideration for EFB processing.

In addition to combustion using conventional or this upgraded incinerator, thermal processing routes also include pyrolysis, with slow pyrolysis specifically for biochar production and fast pyrolysis for bio-oil production. Another pyrolysis variant is mild pyrolysis or torrefaction for the production of torrified biomass. Then there's gasification to maximize gas (syngas) production from biomass. Furthermore, empty fruit bunches of palm oil can be used as fuel or an energy source. To facilitate handling, storage, and reduce transportation costs, empty fruit bunches need to undergo biomass densification technology, with the final product being pellets or briquettes. 

Laboratory-Scale Pyrolysis Equipment for Biochar Production Trials and Research

The decarbonization trend continues to grow across all sectors of life as part of a global consensus to save the earth. Biomass plays a strategic role through biotransition, where biomass acts as a carbon-neutral fuel, thus preventing it from contributing to increased CO2 emissions in the atmosphere, and through carbon-negative programs with carbon sequestration. Substantively, decarbonization through carbon-negative programs (CDR/carbon dioxide removal) will be effective if biomass fuel, as a carbon-neutral fuel, or the use of other renewable energy sources, is also increased. In other words, efforts to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations cannot simply involve absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere (carbon capture and storage). In the context of biomass-based renewable energy, the practical application of wood chip and wood pellet production as carbon-neutral renewable fuels will complement biochar (carbon-negative). Read more details here.

Biochar, a product of biomass pyrolysis, or biocarbon products used as a medium for climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration/carbon sinks, is not yet as popular as the use of biomass as a renewable energy source, such as wood chips, wood pellets, or palm kernel shells (PKS). For comparison, global biochar production in 2023 was 350,000 tons, while wood pellet production was 47 million tons. With a conversion of biomass to biochar of approximately 30%, the amount of dry biomass processed into biochar in 2023 was 1.2 million tons, compared to 47 million tons of wood pellets in the same year, or only about 2.6% of the biomass used for wood pellets—a significant gap. However, biochar is predicted to gain momentum and be produced on a large scale globally. The application of biochar as part of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is currently experiencing the fastest growth compared to other CO2 reduction (CDR) efforts. Biochar leads in CDR credits in the voluntary carbon market (VCM), with over 90% globally by 2023 as per the cdr.fyi database.

Furthermore, carbon capture and storage (CCS) applications using absorber-stripper columns, where the captured carbon dioxide is stored in the Earth's crust, remain expensive. Pyrolysis technology for biochar production, meanwhile, is increasingly developing, making it easy to operate, efficient, and environmentally friendly, with the potential to produce various by-products that offer additional benefits. These pyrolysis units can even be integrated with processing plants, such as palm oil mills. For more details, read here.

Including the BECCS (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage) application which is overall a carbon negative program or CO2 removal from the atmosphere (CDR / Carbon Dioxide Removal) but building a bioenergy unit such as a biomass power plant itself is also not cheap, especially with the addition of carbon capture and storage (CCS) equipment. A number of countries that already have many biomass power plants, for example Japan with around 300 biomass power plants, to become carbon negative operations or part of CO2 removal from the atmosphere (CDR / Carbon Dioxide Removal) will be easier by upgrading them with the installation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) equipments. But in general, to absorb CO2 in the atmosphere and achieve climate targets, the application of biochar produced with pyrolysis units is easier, cheaper and strategic.

To anticipate and prepare for the growing era of CO2 removal from the atmosphere (CDR), biochar research must also be enhanced. Pyrolysis equipment that can cover or carry out comprehensive biochar production trials under all measurable production process operating conditions is crucial. Biochar product quality parameters are determined by three factors: the raw material or type of biomass, the production process, and the biomass pretreatment. For more details, read here. Important variables in the biochar production process in the pyrolysis unit, such as duration/residence time, temperature, and heating rate, must also be able to be handled with this equipment.

Furthermore, the issue of exhaust emissions is also crucial. This is because carbon standards organizations like Puro, Verra, and CSI require exhaust emissions to meet certain thresholds. Furthermore, excess heat from pyrolysis and/or liquid and gaseous products must be utilized. This means that laboratory-scale pyrolysis equipment must be sophisticated enough to meet these requirements. Following the methodologies developed by these standards organizations is essential for producing certified biochar to earn carbon credits. With each ton of CO2 equivalent removed from the atmosphere, or CO2 Removal Certificates (CORCs), worth over $150, this is certainly very attractive.

The diverse uses of biochar, such as in agriculture, animal husbandry, and even for concrete construction, further encourage its implementation in the future. Even if there is a question, for example, about the use of biochar in the agricultural sector: should biochar be prioritized for soil fertility or climate solutions first? This is certainly not a dichotomous question, but rather a driving force for its application, which is strongly influenced by factors that are problematic in the region or area. For more details, read here. To achieve the best performance while minimizing the risks of biochar production, increasing biochar production capacity is necessary, starting from the laboratory scale, pilot scale, demo scale, and finally commercial plants. By understanding the characteristics of the production process gradually and in depth, the hope is that the success rate of large-scale or commercial production will also be high. 

Biochar and Premium Compost Production from Organic Waste Processing

Biochar and compost production both use organic materials. The difference lies in their compatibility level. Wet, nutrient-rich organic materials with little lignin are more suitable for compost production. Dry, lignin-rich organic materials are more suitable for biochar production. Therefore, sorting these organic materials is necessary to achieve optimal results. With organic waste comprising up to 60% of municipal waste, the raw material requirements for both biochar and compost production are estimated to be substantial.

Biochar production is a thermal process, while compost production is a biological process. A biochar production unit, a pyrolysis unit, can be installed adjacent to and integrated with a compost production unit at municipal waste treatment facilities and similar facilities. The biochar product is then used to produce compost, improving the quality of the compost to premium compost and accelerating composting times. For more details, read here. Premium compost can also be sold at a higher price commensurate with its quality. Excess energy from biochar production or pyrolysis operations can be utilized in the waste processing of RDF fractions or others. 

The production potential of this premium compost is enormous. This makes it suitable for use on critical land from post-mining reclamation, which covers millions of hectares, or even hundreds of millions of hectares of degraded drylands. When premium compost is applied to unproductive or less productive land, it becomes fertile. For example, revegetation of post-mining reclaimed land will yield a variety of agricultural or plantation products that are economically, environmentally, and socially beneficial. Biochar, with its high carbon content, will persist in the soil for hundreds of years and, as a carbon sequestration measure, can be offset by earning carbon credits. 

Compost Production with Biochar to Improve Compost Product Quality and Business Profit

Although compost and biochar production both utilize and recycle organic waste, there are several differences: compost production through aerobic fermentation is a biological process, while biochar production through pyrolysis is a thermal process. Furthermore, regarding raw materials, ideal compost production requires a moisture content of 60–70%, high nutrient content, and low lignin content, such as food waste and animal manure. Conversely, ideal biochar production requires a moisture content of 10–20% and a high lignin content, such as woody biomass.

Recent research suggests that adding biochar to the composting process accelerates composting, reduces greenhouse gas emissions such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), reduces ammonia (NH3) loss, increases aeration and reduces compost density, and reduces odor. The biochar itself is not damaged or decomposed during the composting process but enriches it with various nutrients.

To achieve optimal results, the biochar dosage must be appropriate to the amount of organic matter used in the compost. Using too much biochar will disrupt the composting biodegradation process, and using too little biochar will diminish the positive effects mentioned above. With the appropriate dosage, biochar can accelerate the composting process. This is because it increases the homogeneity and structure of the mixture and stimulates microbial activity in the composting process.

This increased microbial activity will increase the temperature and speed up the composting process. Several studies have shown that adding 5% to 10% of the biochar volume at the start of composting can speed up the composting process by 20%. While the average compost production time is 2 months (9 weeks), adding biochar at the above dosage can speed up the composting process by 20%, or approximately 1.6 months (7 weeks). With the shorter production time and better compost quality, the added biochar can lead to a higher selling price, potentially equivalent to premium compost. This can offset the cost of adding biochar to the compost production process.

The pores in biochar reduce the bulk density of the compost and aid aeration during composting. For nitrogen-rich compost materials such as livestock manure, adding biochar can reduce N loss during composting, particularly NH3. The unpleasant odor is caused by the release of NH3 during composting, and for this reason, many composting facility developments are rejected by local residents. In a study, adding 20% ​​biochar (mass basis) to poultry litter reduced NH3 concentrations in gas emissions by 64% and N loss by 52% without negatively impacting the composting process.

When used, compost decomposes, with nutrients absorbed by plants, while biochar remains in the soil for centuries. This makes biochar a long-term solution for improving soil quality. Using biochar in compost offers both short-term and long-term benefits. The short-term benefit is as an organic fertilizer, while the long-term benefit is improving or stabilizing soil quality and sequestering carbon. CO2 absorbed through photosynthesis becomes biomass, or organic matter, as the raw material for biochar, and the carbon in biochar remains stable for hundreds of years, and is not released into the atmosphere during this time.

There is no data yet showing the calculated amount of compost production in Indonesia per year. However, the potential for compost production from domestic organic waste is very large, reaching around 60% of the total national waste generation which reaches more than 60 million tons per year or more than 36 million tons of organic waste as raw material for compost. There are a number of parties carrying out compost production in various regions in Indonesia, both government and private parties who contribute to compost production, with varying production capacities. With the very abundant organic raw materials (more than 36 million tons/year), the production of biochar-enriched compost can be carried out so as to maximize the quality of compost and other benefits.

This can be achieved by building a biochar production unit or installing a pyrolysis unit at the organic waste source. Organic waste materials that are less suitable for composting can be used for biochar production. Several companies are already planning to do this. Read the related article here.