Green Economy in the Cement Industry Part 8 : A Comprehensive Approach and the Role of Biomass

Efforts to reduce or lower CO2 in the cement industry continue to develop with various methods to achieve adequate targets. The global target is to achieve Net-Zero Emissions by 2050 while intermediate targets depend more specifically on the cement industry itself, for example, there is a cement industry that targets to reduce its emissions by 35% with a 1990 baseline in 2025 and then to more than 40% in 2030. This can practically be translated into a reduction in CO2 emissions in cement production from around 800 kg CO2/ton of cement, to 520 kg/ton of cement in 2025 and less than 475 kg/ton of cement in 2030. To achieve this target, the industry must create a roadmap that refers to the latest climate solutions in the cement industry, so that it is easier to achieve based on science (Science-Based Targets / SBT).

While the motivations for reducing CO2 emissions are similar across the world, progress is not uniform across regions. Europe is the fastest region to move forward due to its readiness, supported by a number of factors, including:
• Regulations that prioritize efficient resource use and promote a circular economy.
• Economic incentives to switch to cleaner fuels, which in many cases result in negative energy costs.
• Greater market acceptance of blended cement and consumer demand for low-carbon products.
• Significant government support for research and testing of cleaner technologies.
• Carbon emissions regulations, which result in a predictable carbon price.

Efforts to reduce CO2 emissions in cement plants directly or directly related to cement production are focused on three things, namely the use of alternative fuels or renewable energy or low-carbon fuels, reducing emissions from the calcination process and the use of cement additives (supplementary cementious material / SCM) or lowering clinker factor. While indirect efforts can be done by using electricity from renewable energy for the operation of the cement plants.

Technically or technologically in achieving the target of reducing CO2 emissions in the cement industry, the alternative energy sector or more specifically biomass fuel is in third place. This is because the largest source of emissions in cement plants or around 60% comes from the calcination process (clinker production), while combustion or related to fuel is only around 40%. This is so that carbon capture or CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) in an effort to achieve emission targets is ranked first, then clinker substitution with additives or SCM (Supplementary Cementious Material) is in second place, and the use of alternative fuels including biomass is in third place. CCS technology is still expensive so that its implementation is still constrained, so that in practice it has not been done much but clinker substitution and the use of alternative energy including biomass are easier to do, so many cement plants have done it.

If efforts to become net zero emissions in coal-fired power plants can be done by converting their fuel to 100% biomass, then in cement plants it cannot be done by simply replacing the fuel with biomass because the main source of carbon emissions in cement plants is in their clinker production. So if a cement plant does this, the percentage of CO2 that can be reduced is only a maximum of 40%, meaning that CO2 emissions from the calcination process (clinker production) of 60% still occur. The use of clinker for cement production can be reduced so that CO2 emissions from clinker production can be reduced. That is why in cement plants the use of SCM for clinker substitution, the ratio or portion must also be increased. But of course it is impossible to reduce clinker production to zero or eliminate the calcination process and replace it entirely with SCM (lowering clinker factor) to reduce the 60% CO2 emissions.

This is so that the higher the ratio of clinker to cement produced (C/S), the greater the CO2 emissions produced and vice versa. China has the lowest ratio of clinker to cement (C/S) in the world today, which is 0.58, while a number of areas in other countries have the highest C/S ratio of up to 0.89, namely in the United States. While in Europe 0.77, then in India 0.68, in Latin America 0.71 and the global average is 0.76. It can also be understood that China uses SCM with the highest portion compared to countries in the world. That is why to achieve net zero emissions in cement plants, CCS (carbon capture and storage) equipment need to be added.

About CCS (carbon capture and storage) a number of innovations are being developed so that this technology is cheaper and easier to apply to cement plants. This also includes increasing the efficiency of CO2 capture, the use of new generation non-aqueous solvents, and cheaper modular technology. The transformation of captured CO2 into new marketable products is also the next focus.

The use of alternative fuels with high biomass content is highly recommended for cement plants to reduce CO2. But in reality, there are usually still a number of obstacles during its implementation so that it is even difficult to increase the ratio. These obstacles include the availability, quality and quantity of biomass waste, logistics and supporting infrastructure, market dynamics, the economics of the price of biomass waste-based fuels and a number of limiting technical factors related to the characteristics of the biomass fuel. A number of agricultural or plantation biomass wastes such as rice husks, palm kernel shells, cashew nut shells and olive seeds have also been used as biomass fuels in cement plants. Obtaining a supply of biomass fuel in sufficient volume, standard quality and continuous / sustainable is very important for cement plants to support the reduction of CO2 emissions. And basically there is no choice for cement plants to avoid climate problems, so what must be done is to respond to it with real action.  

Biochar for Energy Plantations

The low productivity of wood from energy plantations is one of the obstacles to the development of energy plantations. Although energy plantation plants such as calliandra can grow on marginal or critical lands, the quality of the soil affects the productivity of the wood produced. This makes it important to improve the quality of the soil of these energy plantations so that they can produce optimal plant productivity. Biochar can be an effective solution for this. Biomass waste that pollutes the environment can be used for biochar production or wood products from these energy plantations can be partly used for biochar production.

Biochar and energy plantations are two positive things for climate solutions. Energy plantations for the production of carbon neutral biomass fuels such as wood pellets, while biochar is to improve soil quality, save fertilizer use and so on and as carbon sequestration / carbon sinks that are carbon negative. The biochar solution for energy plantations will maximize CO2 reduction and sustainability efforts. The vastness of energy plantations is because they are pursuing the target of producing biomass fuel quantities which are comparable to land use and also comparable to the use of biochar. This is so that industrial-scale biochar production is needed to support this, read more details here. The more damaged the land or critical lands are, the greater the need for biochar. And the production of large-capacity biochar has the opportunity to get carbon credit or BCR (Biochar Carbon Removal) credit which can be a driving force for the growth of biochar industries.

Critical and marginal lands should be prioritized as energy plantation lands. This will not only restore land quality but will also provide added value to land use and efforts to prevent disasters. Land legality is also an important concern. Land must be clear and clean, meaning free from disputes so that it does not cause problems in the future. Furthermore, industrial forest plantation land (HTI) which is indeed in accordance with its designation as a production forest can also be used for energy plantation land. How damaged or degraded the land is will determine how much biochar is used. Meanwhile, the creation of energy plantations from land conversion from protected forests / conservation forests to production forests should be prohibited, because instead of saving the environment, it will actually have a greater negative impact on the environment. So opening forest land (deforestation) for energy plantations is not recommended at all.

Decarbonization of the Iron and Steel Industry Part 3: from Low Carbon Production to Carbon Neutral Production

When the decarbonization target must be achieved according to the specified deadline, various efforts will also be made, including through a transition phase. The transition phase in the iron and steel industry is from low carbon production to neutral carbon production. There are a number of factors that influence towards this goal, especially the readiness of the market to buy iron and steel products produced from the production process and also the readiness of fuel and reducing agents for blast furnaces in the iron and steel industry. Charcoal is a fuel and reducing agent derived from biomass which has great potential for use in this transition phase. Charcoal as a carbonization or biomass pyrolysis product has a high calorific value, high fixed carbon and is stable.

Meanwhile, carbon neutral production conditions will be achieved when iron and steel production in the industry uses 100% renewable energy. The use of an electric furnace (EAF/Electric Arc Furnace) can be done as long as the electricity is produced from renewable energy sources. Likewise, the use of hydrogen fuel in blast furnaces (with electrical energy for plant operations also from renewable energy) is also able to achieve carbon neutral production conditions, and even the use of hydrogen fuel in blast furnaces is considered to be the ultimate goal in decarbonization of the iron and steel industry. With the target of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and the average service life of blast furnaces being 20 years, the iron and steel industry's efforts to achieve the target must be well formulated and programmed. Even if efforts to replace blast furnaces do not follow this target time, it will put the achievement of net zero emissions by 2050 in jeopardy.

In fact, currently it is still far from achieving this goal because the construction of blast furnaces - basic oxygen furnaces (BF -BOF) is still being carried out, which should be EAF (Electric Arc Furnace) or currently only around 30% of the global iron and steel industry uses this EAF. Even the International Energy Association (IEA) highlighted this critical issue to achieve the Paris Agreement's net-zero target by 2050. CO2 intensity in this industry has only slightly decreased so that the use of renewable energy becomes increasingly important and accelerated.

A case example is the Japanese iron and steel industry. As a steel producer of more than 85 million tons per year with main use in domestic construction projects and automotive manufacturing and with more than 25% (more than 21 million tons) being exported, the Japanese steel industry has a significant influence on the global market. The dominant dependence on coal is the main problem of decarbonization and moreover, Japan is also the third largest coal importer in the world. Furthermore, decarbonization in Japan is considered inadequate because the Japanese steel industry lags behind other major world steel producers. Japan is a G7 country that does not implement a coal phaseout period.

Nippon Steel has even been labeled a climate laggard or slow to respond to the climate crisis in the Asian region. This is because the decarbonization strategy is inadequate or not in accordance with the IPCC's 1.5°C warming pathway or the IEA's net-zero pathways. This condition threatens national and global decarbonization targets and puts Japan's steel industry at risk. Meanwhile demand for low-carbon steel is increasing rapidly because steel industries and governments around the world are committed to reducing carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The Japanese steel industry needs to immediately decarbonize to remain competitive in the global market. Decarbonizing by investing in low-carbon steel production will address these risks and can position the Japanese steel industry as a leader in the green transition of the global steel industry.

 

Regarding the issue of fuel or renewable energy sources, biomass has a strategic position and role, namely in blast furnace operations, charcoal, which is a product of biomass carbonization, is used as a fuel and reducing agent, while in electricity production for iron and steel plant operations, biomass can be used as a renewable energy sources or biomass power plants. This is why the availability of biomass is very important so that the creation of energy plantations as a source of biomass is very necessary. Not only is the plantation a source of energy, it can also play a role in the production of food and feed, both of which are very beneficial for human life. And of course optimizing the use of the plantation by utilizing all parts of the tree (whole tree utilization) also provides maximum financial / economic benefits and with good management it will also provide benefits or improve the environment. And ideally by 2050 the steel industries will use electric arc furnaces / EAF, 100% hydrogen in blast furnaces and even a combination of carbon capture, to achieve net zero emissions in 2050 or even negative emissions so it is very good for the climate.

Reducing Emissions or Increasing Electric Vehicles?

The photo from here

Basically the main background of the two things above is climate problem due to greenhouse gases, especially CO2 (carbon dioxide), so of course the fundamental answer or priority is to reduce these emissions (greenhouse gases). Electric vehicles can reduce these emissions if the prerequisites are met. The main prerequisite, of course, is where the source of the electrical energy used comes from. If the source of electricity is from fossil energy sources such as oil, coal and natural gas which produce greenhouse gas emissions, in essence the electric vehicle is not environmentally friendly, even though the power plants is far from the use of the electric vehicles.

Electric vehicles should use electricity from renewable energy sources so they don't increase the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, one of which can be read here. Production of electricity from renewable energy should be encouraged and supported first so that the amount is sufficient and after that only proceed with these electric vehicles. If this is not done, then no matter how many electric vehicles (buses, cars, and electric motorcycles) it will still not have a positive effect on the climate. A comprehensive understanding of the climate problem including its solutions and especially in the field of transportation with electric vehicles is something important, before moving on to the implementation stage.

Carbon capture and storage technology (Carbon Capture and Storage / CCS) has indeed been introduced, but its implementation is still very minimal and expensive so this technology has not been applied in Indonesia, especially in fossil-fuel power plants, the majority of which are coal. A number of CCS technologies that are being tested are amine-based adsorption (organic compounds and functional groups whose contents consist of lone-paired nitrogen atoms) are the most advanced carbon capture technologies. But apart from technical factors, economic factors are still the main obstacle.

So the best choice is to encourage and support as much as possible the use of renewable energy sources as a source of energy for these electric vehicles. If the electric vehicle operates with a renewable energy source that is environmentally friendly because it does not increase CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere or is an effort to decarbonize the transportation sector, then that is essentially a program that is perfectly successful according to the intent and purpose of developing the electric vehicle.

Production of Cow Dung Briquettes / Pellets as Fuel and Bioeconomy

The use of renewable energy is increasing along with global awareness of environmental and climate issues. Materials that used to be considered waste and polluted the environment, now with the concept of zero waste and circular economy, many have been converted into alternative energy or renewable energy. Large industries such as power plants, cement industry and so on have started to use this renewable energy in the framework of CO2 emission reduction or decarbonization programs. This decarbonization program is increasingly popular and is applied to various lines of life. 

As a real example is the cement industry in the UAE, namely Gulf Cement Co., which uses renewable energy from camel dung. From the results of operational trials it was found that every 2 tons of camel dung can replace 1 ton of coal. The use of animal dung as fuel is actually not a new thing for them, from ancestral stories cow dung has been used as heating or fuel, but many have not thought of camel dung. Gulf Cement Co currently uses 50 tons/day of camel dung as fuel. The UAE has a population of around 9000 camels for milk production, racing and beauty contests. Each camel produces 8 kg of manure per day, more or more than the farmer needs. Through a government program, camel breeders collect the camel dung at collection points. 

Cow dung has also been used as an energy source from the United States, Zimbabwe to China. In Indonesia this should also be done. With each cow producing an average of 15 kg of dung per day (about 2 times that of a camel), this is the same as the conditions in the UAE above, the volume of dung is more or more than what farmers need. The excess of this waste becomes an environmental problem and even has to be thrown into rivers and so on. Hundreds of tons of cow dung every day are not utilized in a number of areas in Indonesia, even though the dung can be used as fuel, especially when processed into briquettes or pellets (dried first). Compaction of cow dung into briquettes or pellets aims to obtain uniform size and shape, compactness, ease of storage and use, as well as saving on transportation costs. And to meet the needs of cement factory materials, such as briquettes / cow dung pellets are needed in large quantities, so large capacity production equipment is needed that works continuously. It is estimated that the need for pellets or briquettes is thousands to tens of thousands of tons every month.

In a cement plant there are 2 places that need heat energy: 1. calciner (where the calcination process occurs), 2. Rotary kiln (the heart of the cement factory, where the clinker is made). Renewable energy, such as briquettes or cow dung pellets, will usually be used in calciners with separate feeding points. Meanwhile, in rotary kilns that require higher heat, cement plants generally still use fossil fuels. The gradual use of renewable energy will reduce environmental pollution and accelerate the global decarbonization program. The cement plant itself can be said to be an industry that processes and destroys waste. This is because the cement plant can process waste such as slag and fly ash as an additive to the cement it produces - more details can be read here and also destroys waste, such as using cow dung as the fuel.

 

Green Economy in the Cement Industry

The trend of decarbonization, including the low carbon economy, has penetrated various sectors, including the cement industry. Cement is the most common human-made product in the world, consuming about 0.5 tons per person per year. The cement industry is also a significant contributor to greenhouse gases, reaching 21% (IPCC 2014), with these conditions making it one of the biggest contributors to climate change. And because the cement industry has a history as a major contributor to these greenhouse gas emissions, there are opportunities today to reduce emissions significantly through increasing efficiency and innovation in the industry.

Increasing energy efficiency in cement production will reduce the resulting carbon emissions. Even in the cement industry, the use of energy is also slowly starting to be used as renewable energy or alternative energy, including the use of RDF from municipal waste or household waste, which more or less reduces environmental pollution. While in the production aspect the use of additional materials originating from other industrial waste (circular economy) such as slag and fly ash or SCM (supplementary cementious materials) has also been widely used. The addition of these materials depends on the type of cement to be made and aims to reduce the use of clinker because clinker production requires high costs and produces CO2 gas as a result of calcination. For example, the manufacture of slag cement produces 38% less CO2 emissions than the process for the production of portland cement because less limestone is burned for the production of slag cement than is required for Portland cement. In addition, a number of countries also support the production and use of slag cement in order to support environmentally friendly products. The things above also indicate concern for the environment and sustainability is increasing.

In the cement industry, about 50% of emissions come from the calcination process itself, 40% from fuel for heating the kiln, and the remaining 10% from grinding and transport. Inside the calciner, a calcination process occurs, namely the decomposition of CaCO3 into CaO and CO2 and a little MgCO3 into MgO and CO2. Because the calcination reaction is endothermic, high heat is required, so it is equipped with a burner for burning coal utilizing tertiary air from the cooler and hot gas from the kiln. The release of CO2 due to the reaction in the calciner is a crucial environmental issue in the cement industry, the volume of CO2 gas from calcination is much greater than CO2 from burning fuel (coal) or 50% to 40%.

Various types of cement with different qualities often require specific SCM qualities as well. Under these conditions the review is not only general specifications but down to the chemistry of the material. For example slag from a steel plant or Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GBFS) with a certain chemical content or fly ash but with a low alkaline content or slag from a nickel smelter not suitable for certain types of cement and so on. To obtain specific SCM such as slag and fly ash is closely related to the particular source of slag and fly ash, although in some cases it is possible to add certain materials to obtain the desired chemical composition.

And in the cement industry, emissions are not easily reduced. Emissions from processes cannot be reduced by optimizing or using only renewable energy or alternative energy. In the cement industry, when following the scenarios developed by the International Energy Agency (IEA) or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is clear that to reach the limit of 2 C or even 1.5 C, cabon capture and storage / carbon capture and utilization (CCS / CCU) is needed. However, more is needed if the industry is to meet the ambitious goals set by the Paris agreement. The cement industry is particularly challenged by this target because carbon is generated by the energy used in the process and the calcination process itself. Even if energy-based emissions could be eliminated by switching to carbon-neutral fuels, those calcination process emissions would still be present and would require a carbon capture unit (CCS/CCU).

Europe has become a research center for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU). From a number of carbon capture technologies, amine-based absorption (organic compounds and functional groups whose contents consist of lone-paired nitrogen atoms) is the most advanced carbon capture technology and has been implemented on a commercial scale. Carbon capture technology seems to play an important role in fighting climate change, especially in the cement industry.

The Urgency of Ex-Coal Mine Reclamation With Biochar

The large number of ex-coal mines that are not reclaimed causes various environmental problems and even life safety. There have been many casualties from the former coal mine pit. The simple logic should be that after the coal deposit is taken or extracted during the mining activity, the land is returned and repaired so that the quality is better than before the mining activity or at least the same, but not worse so that various environmental problems arise. The era of decarbonization is accelerating because of the driving force of climate change and global warming. Fossil fuels, especially coal, are starting to be abandoned, of course, including the coal mining activity itself. Meanwhile, the area of former coal mines which reaches millions of hectares is a lot of environmental problems today.

When the quality of the soil is improved so that it has high fertility then this becomes a very extraordinary potential so that a number of important activities can be carried out, such as agriculture, animal husbandry and forestry. With such conditions, the effort to self-sufficiency or food sovereignty is not impossible. Technically, it can be analyzed which of the agricultural, livestock and forestry sectors can reach the goal faster, namely food independence or sovereignty. But before going far and doing business on the ex-mining land, to be more specific what products will be made, the basic question is how to improve the condition of the damaged soil and the scale is also massive?

The application of biochar to the soil is a surefire solution in an effort to repair damaged soils. Depending on how severe the damage is, the characteristics of the soil type and the final quality level being targeted will determine the application or dosage of the biochar. In addition to improving the soil, the biochar application also absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere, thereby reducing the concentration of CO2 from the atmosphere or is a carbon negative scenario. Biochar buried in the soil becomes a carbon sink, similar to creating a conservation forest to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. How much biochar is buried so that it can be calculated that the CO2 absorbed into the carbon sink can be sold on the carbon market and get carbon credit. Biochar itself is able to last in the soil for hundreds of years and is not decomposed for a long time. Even when the land has been repaired with biochar and then a conservation forest is made on it, the carbon credit obtained are double, namely from the application of biochar itself and from the conservation forest. But once again, of course, economic factors are another important consideration, so as above, after soil fertility is improved with biochar, there are a number of options for using the land. Of course which one provides the best economic benefits will be the choice.

Millions of hectares of land can be recovered so that its benefits will be maximized. Say, for example, that one million hectares of land can be recovered and then used for activities that support food security or self-sufficiency such as agriculture and animal husbandry, then how much output can be calculated. Even better if there can be a surplus of food production so that it can export. Or even in the longer term, the land is reforested into conservation forest, so how much CO2 can be absorbed by the forest plus the application of biochar. Of course very much. Then why have to build a food estate but have to clear forest land, while there are other better ways? Namely not only restoring but improving the condition of the land even better before the coal mining activity was carried out.

Biomass Boiler and Its Urgency

A problem that is visible and can be felt, especially if it has a short-term impact, is certainly easy to map and find a solution to. But if the opposite namely is not visible, it is difficult to feel and the impact or effect is long-term, of course it is more difficult to map, let alone find a solution. The use of fossil fuels, especially coal in a number of industrial boilers, is an example. The effects of exhaust emissions in the form of COx, NOx and SOx may be difficult to detect at first but create environmental damage in the long term. Likewise heavy metals like mercury which also have long-term effects. Meanwhile, fly ash pollution and boiler furnace ash (bottom ash) are clearly affected more easily. In a larger case or global scale, namely climate change and global warming due to greenhouse gases, especially CO2 (carbon dicside), a global consensus is also needed to solve these problems. That is what makes the Earth Conference on Climate Change (UNFCC) always held every year, which has so far been recorded 27 times, lastly in 2019 in Madrid, Spain, while what was supposed to be held in 2020 was postponed in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fossil fuels including coal are carbon positive fuels so that their use will increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, while biomass fuels such as wood chips, wood pellets, wood briquette and palm kernel shells (PKS) are carbon neutral fuels. It is said to be carbon neutral because of the use of this fuel because it does not increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

 

Boilers are essential equipment for the operation of a number of industries. The main function of the boiler is to produce steam which is used in the industrial production process. But when the boiler is not operated and maintained properly, the boiler can be dangerous. The continuity of production operations also greatly depends on this equipment, so that disruption of boiler operations will have a significant effect on this production. The boiler also consists of a number of subsystems that work in harmony, such as boiler burners and controls, water treatment for boiler feed water preparation, fuel handling and feeding and so on. Sometimes a number of subsystems are supplied from a number of different vendors, so synchronization between these subsystems is very important. This makes boiler operations safe, efficient, reliable and minimizes boiler downtime. And of all the subsystems in the boiler, the burner system is the most sophisticated subsystem in the boiler unit. The burner system has a number of operational modes that require extensive training and / or experience for boiler operators to be well understood.

Currently, a number of industries have started to switch from fossil fuels to biomass fuels. In industries that previously used solid fuels, technical changes or furnace modifications can be minor, while in industries that previously used gas or liquid fuels, the usual thing to do is replace the boiler unit (including the furnace). Of course, the replacement of the boiler unit is also followed by its supporting systems such as fuel storage, provisioning and so on. Petroleum fuels, coal and natural gas are consistent fuels with standard quality and their contaminants or impurities have been known and studied for decades. Whereas with biomass there are a number of options and each source is also unique and also the level of contaminants.

In certain cases, industries that will switch to using biomass, namely palm kernel shells (PKS), that previously using natural gas, so the industry needs to study and analyze the implications of using the PKS. And because the use of PKS for industrial fuel is relatively new, the industry can use old data about their furncae operations with natural gas and compare it to furnace that use solid fuels like coal - which is commonly used by the industry today. Although PKS is also a solid fuel, there are a number of characteristics that distinguish it from coal. In addition, gas combustion can be said to be the most ideal combustion process, which is in terms of stoichiometry or the perfection of combustion compared to combustion of liquid or solid fuels. Large particle size such as coal will also have an effect on combustion and also make a fuel more difficult to burn. So that from this comparison, the industry can get an overview of the burning of the PKS and the scheme below to describe the case.

With adequate analysis, planning and system design, the use of new fuels, especially biomass, such as wood chips, wood pellets, wood briquettes and PKS can be implemented properly. Energy prices and environmental regulations are driving forces for the use of this new fuel. Fixed bed combustion type furnaces are most commonly used in a number of industries. These furnace variants include grate furnace types namely traveling grate, fixed grate system, incline moving grate & horizontally moving grate, vibrating grate, cigar burner and underfeed rotating grate, while other types are underfeed stokers. Meanwhile, the fluidized bed and pulverized combustion types are generally used by power plants. The technical considerations for selecting biomass-based solid fuels include heating value, moisture content, ash content, density, particle size, emissions, availability of these fuels, and suitability for the furnace. In the end, the most optimal combustion rate that is safe and meets environmental standards is the purpose of using the biomass fuel.

Racing for Lowering The Temperature Of The Earth (Part 2)

Biomass as 'carbon neutral fuel' certainly does not stand alone as a great scenario to lower the temperature of the earth due to global warming by greenhouse gas emissions. Advantages of biomass as a renewable energy source because  stable in use, in the sense that is not affected by climatic and weather conditions into a product that is reliable in various scale applications. Efforts to optimize the potential of biomass as an energy source can be viewed from the supply side to use.

On the supply side, the assuredness of supply of biomass as a raw material is an absolute must if you want to use as a primary energy source, for the amount of effort from collecting a variety of waste biomass that was originally only disposed to look for species with a short rotation coppice (SRC), high productivity and a positive effect on nature with is made energy plantations. One of these plants is Calliandra to the tropics, while in sub-tropical regions such as Europe using poplar and willow species. We should be grateful to Allah SWT because of the location in tropical Indonesia make caliandra crop productivity could be 4 times faster than the temperate sub-tropical or concrete four years poplar and willow in Europe as 1 year calliandra in Indonesia. 

While looking at the utilization, biomass energy should be used widely, easy, inexpensive and efficient. Biomass can be used in place or used elsewhere far enough. On the use of on-site or a short distance, biomass usually uniform in size or plus drying.  Whereas for use in locations far enough biomass need to be added process again with compaction (densification) in the form of pellets or briquettes. The biomass is then processed  in thermal route (the most popular) by combustion, pyrolysis or gasification to extract energy content.

The position of Europe has surpassed North America in a race to lower the temperature of the earth or the effort to reduce global warming. After previous EU implementing RED (EU's Renewable Energy Directive) commonly known as the 20-20-20 targets or mandates that are intended to reduce 20% of greenhouse gas emissions from 1995 as base level; 20% decrease in energy consumption; and to 20% for renewable energy. It also makes Europe is the largest consumer or market  of wood pellets with an estimated 80% of world production, followed by the United States and third, South Korea.

Currently the EU is being approached in 2020 for the realization of the 20-20-20 targets but on the other hand they began to prepare the draft for the new policy climate and energy issues from years 2020-2030. EU has proposed a new target in 2030 including a 40% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions, a 30% decrease in energy consumption and 27% for the use of renewable energy. Currently they are also looking for a strategy to achieve the 2030 targets. History also shows how biomass policies is the main driver for the development of pellets market in Europe. It is also widely used as a model of a particular region or country to implement renewable energy policies, especially biomass sector.