Compared to conventional biomass fuels such as wood pellets are only capable of a maximum of 10% in co-firing with coal because of the
nature of chemistry and physic are much different whereas if the percentage of co-firing with coal increased to
20% required
the addition of a large
investment for the handling and processingnya, then torrefied wood even capable of co-firing with coal to 40%. Another advantage is on the side of the
powerplant also just needed a little
extra investment for handling and processingnya for torrefied wood, due to the physico-chemical properties are not much different.
Densification or compaction into pellets or torrefied wood briquettes will also give a more significant savings than wood pellets, ie 15.0-18.7 MJ/m3 on torrified
pellets and
7.5-10.4 MJ/m3 at wood pellets. Because the
torrefied wood brittle, so it can be burned with coal dipulverize and more advisable, instead
of using the material
handling, processing to a separate injection system. This will result in significant savings on equipment
modification when cofiring at a greater percentage. A number of agro-industry waste biomass such as empty fruit bunches and palm thatch can torrefaksi as well
as woody biomass, to enhance combustion
conditions in the coal system.
Torrefied wood cofiring has been successfully carried
out one of them in the coal power
plant in Borselle, Netherlands. Research also shows that the smoothing torrefied wood into powder with a specific particle size distribution and allows for the smooth fluidization regimes on the feeding entrained flow process (gasifier and pulverized coal boilers).
No comments:
Post a Comment