Green Economy in the Cement Industry Part 8 : A Comprehensive Approach and the Role of Biomass

Efforts to reduce or lower CO2 in the cement industry continue to develop with various methods to achieve adequate targets. The global target is to achieve Net-Zero Emissions by 2050 while intermediate targets depend more specifically on the cement industry itself, for example, there is a cement industry that targets to reduce its emissions by 35% with a 1990 baseline in 2025 and then to more than 40% in 2030. This can practically be translated into a reduction in CO2 emissions in cement production from around 800 kg CO2/ton of cement, to 520 kg/ton of cement in 2025 and less than 475 kg/ton of cement in 2030. To achieve this target, the industry must create a roadmap that refers to the latest climate solutions in the cement industry, so that it is easier to achieve based on science (Science-Based Targets / SBT).

While the motivations for reducing CO2 emissions are similar across the world, progress is not uniform across regions. Europe is the fastest region to move forward due to its readiness, supported by a number of factors, including:
• Regulations that prioritize efficient resource use and promote a circular economy.
• Economic incentives to switch to cleaner fuels, which in many cases result in negative energy costs.
• Greater market acceptance of blended cement and consumer demand for low-carbon products.
• Significant government support for research and testing of cleaner technologies.
• Carbon emissions regulations, which result in a predictable carbon price.

Efforts to reduce CO2 emissions in cement plants directly or directly related to cement production are focused on three things, namely the use of alternative fuels or renewable energy or low-carbon fuels, reducing emissions from the calcination process and the use of cement additives (supplementary cementious material / SCM) or lowering clinker factor. While indirect efforts can be done by using electricity from renewable energy for the operation of the cement plants.

Technically or technologically in achieving the target of reducing CO2 emissions in the cement industry, the alternative energy sector or more specifically biomass fuel is in third place. This is because the largest source of emissions in cement plants or around 60% comes from the calcination process (clinker production), while combustion or related to fuel is only around 40%. This is so that carbon capture or CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) in an effort to achieve emission targets is ranked first, then clinker substitution with additives or SCM (Supplementary Cementious Material) is in second place, and the use of alternative fuels including biomass is in third place. CCS technology is still expensive so that its implementation is still constrained, so that in practice it has not been done much but clinker substitution and the use of alternative energy including biomass are easier to do, so many cement plants have done it.

If efforts to become net zero emissions in coal-fired power plants can be done by converting their fuel to 100% biomass, then in cement plants it cannot be done by simply replacing the fuel with biomass because the main source of carbon emissions in cement plants is in their clinker production. So if a cement plant does this, the percentage of CO2 that can be reduced is only a maximum of 40%, meaning that CO2 emissions from the calcination process (clinker production) of 60% still occur. The use of clinker for cement production can be reduced so that CO2 emissions from clinker production can be reduced. That is why in cement plants the use of SCM for clinker substitution, the ratio or portion must also be increased. But of course it is impossible to reduce clinker production to zero or eliminate the calcination process and replace it entirely with SCM (lowering clinker factor) to reduce the 60% CO2 emissions.

This is so that the higher the ratio of clinker to cement produced (C/S), the greater the CO2 emissions produced and vice versa. China has the lowest ratio of clinker to cement (C/S) in the world today, which is 0.58, while a number of areas in other countries have the highest C/S ratio of up to 0.89, namely in the United States. While in Europe 0.77, then in India 0.68, in Latin America 0.71 and the global average is 0.76. It can also be understood that China uses SCM with the highest portion compared to countries in the world. That is why to achieve net zero emissions in cement plants, CCS (carbon capture and storage) equipment need to be added.

About CCS (carbon capture and storage) a number of innovations are being developed so that this technology is cheaper and easier to apply to cement plants. This also includes increasing the efficiency of CO2 capture, the use of new generation non-aqueous solvents, and cheaper modular technology. The transformation of captured CO2 into new marketable products is also the next focus.

The use of alternative fuels with high biomass content is highly recommended for cement plants to reduce CO2. But in reality, there are usually still a number of obstacles during its implementation so that it is even difficult to increase the ratio. These obstacles include the availability, quality and quantity of biomass waste, logistics and supporting infrastructure, market dynamics, the economics of the price of biomass waste-based fuels and a number of limiting technical factors related to the characteristics of the biomass fuel. A number of agricultural or plantation biomass wastes such as rice husks, palm kernel shells, cashew nut shells and olive seeds have also been used as biomass fuels in cement plants. Obtaining a supply of biomass fuel in sufficient volume, standard quality and continuous / sustainable is very important for cement plants to support the reduction of CO2 emissions. And basically there is no choice for cement plants to avoid climate problems, so what must be done is to respond to it with real action.  

Green Economy in the Cement Industry Part 7: Use of Biomass Fuel Apart from Clinker Substitution in Cement Plants

Cement plants are unique or different compared to processing plants or other industries, namely that the majority of carbon emissions (CO2) are produced not from fuel use but from clinker production. CO2 emissions from clinker production reach 60%, while from fuel use it is only 40%. This indicates that decarbonization efforts in cement plants must prioritize these two things. 

The use of cement additives or SCM (supplementary cementious material) as a substitute for clinker has played a major role in decarbonization in cement plants. The greater the use of SCM or the smaller the clinker to cement ratio, the smaller the carbon emissions in cement production. The use of SCM is generally used in cement production in plants, but there is use of SCM in concrete production, even in a larger portion than in cement production, which is common in the United States.

Cement plants in general are major users of coal with large volumes so they must be gradually reduced as part of decarbonization efforts. Regarding carbon emissions from the use of this fuel, many cement plants use alternative energy such as used tires or RDF from municipal solid waste (MSW). Ideally, the use of renewable fuels will reduce carbon emissions significantly. This is why a number of cement plants have started using biomass fuel such as agricultural waste or wood waste from wood working industries. The greater the portion of renewable fuel used, such as agricultural waste biomass and such wood industry, the lower the carbon emissions produced.

The use of technology to increase fuel efficiency also reduces carbon emissions, such as the use of preheaters and precalciners, because there is savings in fuel use in clinker production. But there are also certain specific conditions, for example the production of type II/V or type V cement (high sulfate resistance) will require more fuel because cement requires clinker with a low C3A (tricalcium aluminate) content, the process of which requires more heat energy.

The analogy to a coal-fired power plant in decarbonization efforts is more or less the same as a cement plant. Coal power plants are industries that produce large carbon emissions, like cement plants. At coal-fired power plants, decarbonization efforts begin by cofiring coal with biomass. The biomass ratio in the cofiring continues to be increased over time. The greater the cofiring ratio or biomass portion, the lower the carbon emissions. At a certain level, the coal power plants will be 100% replaced with biomass (fulfiring).

If efforts to become zero carbon emissions (net zero emissions) in coal power plants can be done by converting the fuel into 100% biomass, then in cement plants it cannot be done simply by replacing the fuel with biomass because the main source of carbon emissions in cement plants is in the clinker production. That is why in cement plants the use of SCM to substitute clinker, the ratio or portion must also be increased. Maximizing biomass fuel use and using SCM also cannot reduce carbon emissions to zero (net zero emissions), because of the calcination process. This is why to achieve net zero emissions in cement plants it is necessary to add CCS (carbon capture and storage) unit.

Ideally, when a coal-fired power plant converts 100% of its fuel to biomass, the carbon emissions are zero (net zero emissions) and if CCS equipment is added, it becomes carbon negative emissions. Meanwhile, in cement plants, the use of optimum SCM and 100% biomass fuel still cannot achieve zero carbon emissions, so CCS equipment needs to be added to capture CO2 from the calcination process to achieve zero carbon and if want to achieve carbon negative emission conditions, CCS is also needed to be used to capture CO2 from burning or using biomass fuel.